Chuck Beatty
Internet Posts, March 2006


Home

From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Date: Sun, Mar 5 2006 11:15 pm
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

I posted that I thought Sterling Tompkins worked as an OSA volunteer, here on ARS a couple weeks back. Sterling is one of these younger generation ex Int staffers, who I heard was likely an OSA volunteer.

I guess he is.

I just heard that OSA told Sterling about "some" post (my post) on the internet that he was a volunteer working for OSA.

So OSA is live monitoring everything said on ARS and directly telling people like Sterling that this was posted about him.

Chuck Beatty



From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Date: Tues, Mar 7 2006 10:04 am
Email: [email protected]
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

I have to go to work, now, but Kenny called me.

Asked me to "stop committing present time overts" by talking about him or other people.

Silencing tactic.

Obviously the Scientology mentality does not allow faithful adherents to discuss their opinions and their lives and interactions with the other members of the church they no longer belong to.

Too bad.

The church unwittingly engages in self-inflicted "mind control" that they believe they are making the world a "safe environment" (Hubbard's concept) by spreading their brand of opinion silencing, like this Kenny Shapiro attempt to get me to stop speaking out and getting others to speak out.

I have no disagreement with the good things Scientology mangages to perform for the world.

Carry on.

Just stop the bad stuff like the leader of the movement slapping, punching, ranting, scolding, humilating people at the top ranks of the movement.

Please relay this back, Kenny, "stop the petty violence at the top ranks of the movement."

That would be some excellent news to leak out, if the petty physical abuse stops!

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)
Flag Dec 1975-Jun 1983 (TTC, Sup, Word Clearer, D of T, etc.)
Int Base 1983-1984 (Routing Forms Pjt)
Snr HCO Int in the FB in LA 1984-87
Re-Training (Int and LA) 87-88
Int Training Org, LA 88 (Sec Checker Sup)
LRH Tech Research and Comps, CMO Int, (Sept 88-Feb 89)
Int RPF (Feb-Mar 89)
PAC RPF (Mar-May 89)
Int Training Org (May-Sept 89) (Admin Sup)
INCOMM Sep 89-Sept 90 (Routing Forms Pjt)
INCOMM Sept 90-May92 (Computer Room LA & Int)
ASI May 92-Dec95 (Computer Room, In-Training Esto)
Decks Int (Dec 95-Jun 96)
Int RPF (Jun 96-Nov 2000)
PAC RPF (Nov 2000-Mar2003)
Routed out March 29, 2003.
Join XSO and network to old Sea Org friends:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSO/
Chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
http://www.freewebs.com/chuckbeatty77/
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05205/542899.stm
412-260-1170 (I'll be happy to network anyone to anyone)
(media call me from time to time, and I will
network anyone to media so people with firsthand
experiences can anonymously or publicly help
expose things that obviously should be changed
inside the movement.)



TIP for ex Sea Org members. Go public!

From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Date: Fri, Mar 10 2006 10:13 am
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

Learn the ropes on going public, by simply doing it. Go public with your name and telling the experiences you think should be exposed.

I urge anyone willing to spend a few years of their life, doing their "bit" trying to expose the wrong activities of the Scientology movement, to go public with your name and experiences.

By going public, the smarter minds in media and the intellectual world will take note, and should you ever receive any of the petty convoluted and disgraceful retaliation and silencing tactics that anyone receives back from the Scientology volunteers, Private Eyes, church hired attornies, etc., those same outside smarter minds will take note of that, and it will recoil right back on the movement.

Go public!

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)



From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Date: Fri, Mar 10 2006 10:26 pm
Email: [email protected]
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

From: Ken Shapiro
To: Sent: Wed, 08 Mar 2006

Dear ----,

I have received a number of responses to my email concerning Chuck Beatty's true motives as to why he left the Church.

Some of the responders have told me stories about how one of Chuck's problems before and during the RPF was that he had repeating impulses to harm other Sea Org staff members and was constantly trying to suppress his rage. This is evidently why he has become so fixated with making his former colleagues wrong and why he is trying to make it appear that the Sea Org is violent. What a crock. Ever hear about an overt-motivator-sequence? How about the subject of "justification" in order to make less of the target of your overt? Chuck feels that if he can solicit enough natter from the XSO it will match his own warped and perverted purposes to destroy the tech and degrade LRH.

One responder said that Beatty is like a "Benedict Arnold" and is reporting everything that goes on in the XSO message board to gossip columnists at the NY Post and the wacko looking reporter at Rolling Stone who obviously didn't get the first thing about Scientology. He is also reporting to David Touretzky, who writes papers about which way rats go in a maze upon being conditioned, hoping that some day and a cost of millions of dollars of "research" funds may have some relevance to human brains.

Beatty is anti-LRH and is turning the XSO board into a hate group by trying to solicit ex-SO members to attack Scientology, the Church, and LRH. I object to this.

One of the other guys I have been in comm with who was on the RPF with Beatty said that Beatty has harbored a hatred toward LRH which came out periodically for years. He is evidently motivated by a desire to cause harm.

As far as I can see XSO has become an extension of Clambake and ARS as you have people like Chuck who post on those boards and then come here and try and act like he is friends with people on the XSO board.

When I asked Chuck how he obtained my phone number he said, "someone gave it to him". I didn't bother to ask him who gave him permission to post my phone number because I knew what his next response was going to be. The result of posting my phone number results in several "strange" calls made by strangers. He had no reason to do that just like he had no reason to post the emails that I had personally sent to specific XSO members. He has descended to the level of the people who post on ARS and Clambake whose sole purpose is to bash my religion.

So that you know, and don't get the twisted version that Chuck will likely post on XSO or ARS, I spoke with him on the phone yesterday and let him know in no uncertan terms exactly how I felt about him and his activities.

Kenny

[end of Kenny's email, and now my comments on this, from Chuck Beatty:]

Hi Warren McShane, Hi Lynn Farney, Hi Ed Parkin, Hi Ken Shapiro,

In my opinion, this Ken Shapiro email above was again composed with OSA Int's assistance or minimally they provided material that Kenny drew from in composing this latest. Lynn Farney, or someone from Invest Bu for sure gave Kenny some written material to look at for Kenny's email above, unless others did it, and Kenny just signed off on it. Possibly Kenny's up to composing some of the above email at this point.

I laughed at the use of the popular Mike Rinder adjective "wacko," in the email above. They just can't seem to apply the viewpoint PL and read back their communication and see the OSA / RTC "think" footprints all over this new Kenny Shapiro email.

In my opinion Kenny will be selectively shown my ARS comments I am writing here at this moment, in a few days.

Kenny doesn't read ARS himself. Kenny isn't allowed to get onto XSO either.

(Thanks to Tory, they probably can't trust volunteers to operate on their own on ARS without getting so sick of their actions, that they defect, like Tory did. Actually it is likely just human nature to come out of any mental bubble world as a result of free interchange of wiser human dialogue.)

My opinion is that the way it goes is this. Warren McShane, who I incorrectly thought had been busted to Gold but I found that as of the end of 2005 Warren was back in RTC, and I found out that Warren daily surfs ARS and Clambake. He then orders whatever he thinks needs additional attention by the interceding volunteer(s) or Private Eyes or subcontracted people who are posting on Clambake and ARS causing the various ebbs and flows of misdirection and veering off of hot subjects.

Warren (or whoever wears this hat in RTC) will see my post, and comment to whoever in OSA Int whose hat it is to work with Kenny Shapiro, and the already existing checklist of steps will procede. Kenny has clearly been drawn into an actual role in this now. I would love to hear if he originated going to OSA and sought their help, or if they sought out Kenny, and recruited him for the delivery vehicle for the OSA / RTC "line" to run against me. I suppose he is is sort of the current version of an OSA volunteer like person. Let's see how Kenny does! My hope is that Kenny defects. Like Tory, like others who "helped" OSA and the GO in years past. You can always defect Kenny!

(In fact, Lynn, Warren, Ed, and hey!, all you guys should know that there are people who will help you out in a heartbeat, should any of you wish to defect! Call toll free 866-XSEAORG and leave me a message, or call me personally, 412-260-1170, I will direct you to someone in LA who can help you out in a pinch.)

Anyways, this new email above has all the footprints of the current OSA and RTC viewpoint and in my opinion this email got church legal sidecheck also. .

I strongly believe that it is only Lynn Farney and Warren or people of similar level of hard-nosed dedication from RTC or OSA Int who's job it is to get onto and monitor XSO, since the freedom of speech displayed there by the XSO people posting there would likely subvert and suborn run of the mill Sea Org staffers who saw what ex Sea Org members are saying. No one on XSO are swayed one bit by my laughably "evil" influence. I'm a very minor underling, and people in the movement for decades know this!

The "responses" Kenny got from his first email, I am sure all came from other OSA Int staffers like Ed Parkin and Gigi Scudilari and other OSA Int staffers who were on the PAC RPF. Ed and Gig were my RPF's RPF MAAs, so they are the ones who supposedly are the foundation for the general overblown statements in the first smear email done in Ken Shapiro's name on me. Gigi and Ed can't speak publicly. Any other sources Kenny claims spoke to Kenny also can't speak publicly. They simply haven't the intellectual stamina to stand up and speak for themselves publicly. They are hampered by the rules that prevent them speaking freely.

Kenny is actually somewhat courageous to even phone me, and I complemented him on being courageous in calling me. Likely he had to fake accepting my complement, since I think he is not so innocently speaking out all on his own. (He knows best to what degree OSA Int is helping provide him the material for these carefully crafted and sidechecked emails.)

The orchestration of fake communication, is just so brittle and apparant, and the OSA / RTC people even with all of Kenny's good nature input, it just all sounds fake and contrived.

In the real world, people speak for themselves, and no one holds back and blinders adults from their rights to see and speak freely their opinions. The Scientology movement needs to back off from interfering with their member's rights to disagree with Hubbard or the movement's leaders, and stop enforcing great penalty for disagreeing and speaking against Hubbard or the movement's official behavior.

The lack of freedom of speech thrust upon the people that Kenny's email above purports to have input from, those people are nameless, and being in the constraints of their lack of full freedom of speech of their own opinions, they lack the viewpoint to see how the world immediately sees the brittle illegitimacy of freedom of thought and speech that they cannot fake.

Not until the Scientology movement allows the blinders off of their members, and allows their members to freely disagree with Hubbard and the movement's leadership when that leadership acts badly or incompetently, will the movement appear to the general public as "free." They aren't free. They are currently constrained, and they George Orwell 1984 style mouth statements claiming they are free, and Hubbard's writings don't allow them any other option but carry on the charade of freedom of opinion and thought and speech, but anyone with real freedom of speech sees their sad plight.

The movement can't fake freedom of opinions and thought and speech, when they don't allow it on themselves.

That's another of their self-created problems, rather a Hubbard instilled problem they have to grapple with.

Comparing these recent two OSA Int composed emails delivered by Kenny Shapiro regarding me, in my opinion they compare almost identically in content and style to last summer's 2005 "NAD" smear posts on ARS about me.

So whoever "NAD" was summer 2005, is the same person or persons behind the Ken Shapiro data above.

The real point is that David Miscavige has apparantly beaten to the ground Mike Rinder, Ray Mitoff and Mark Yager a number of times each, in the past 2 to 3 years. that means the tippy top leader of Scientology has taken it upon himself to act pretty obviously disgracefully to the other tippy top leaders in the movement.

The only relevant point is that that petty violence needs to stop. No one in the movement is doing anything to stop it. They are the effect of David Miscavige's one-man-show at the top.

That is why outside people who are ex members have a great deal of power. That is why I urge those who have seen the petty physical abuse of David Miscavige, to come forward and share their first hand experiences in the recent months and years.

2 people have told me they saw this petty violence by DM against Mark Yager, Ray Mitoff and Mike Rinder, in the past 2-3 years.

David Miscavige's long ago years of petty violence is well reported on the Internet already, and I have spoken or emailed with 4 persons who received or saw it firsthand. There is no denying the petty physical stuff David Miscavige has done years ago.

I thought the violence had stopped. I was even posting that it all stopped. Then people who had been at the top ranks in the last 5 years were sickened by my inaccurate postings about the atmosphere, and they told me I had it wrong, that the petty abuse was going on worse than ever, in 2002, 2003, 2004 and into 2005.

That is why I corrected myself, corrected my opinions, and that's why I think everyone wants that abuse to stop.

It is simply wrong.

And this year, I am hoping that newly departed ex Int staffers are gonna come out and give confirmation on the beatings that apparantly David Miscavige gave to Ray Mitoff, Mark Yager and Mike Rinder (and others). Dozens of people have apparantly witnessed these David Miscavige unnecessary roughness (petty humilation scolding ranting slapping punchings of these top 3 Int execs).

At this point all I think anyone expects David Miscavige to do, is apologize, knock it off, and he should make a standing order to all others at Int to permanently stop all this petty physical abuse crap. The instant good PR that will result, once the news leaks out that this has been ordered stopped, will help repair the hurt this has caused the movement.

No one deserved to be punched unexpectedly in the gut, or slapped to the ground!

Next time Kenny calls me, I hope he's shown my full ARS post here. Kenny said he read my site. I am putting this in my site, so he can read up on the latest.

Kenny was asked, last week, by an XSO person if Kenny was helping OSA "handle" me, and Kenny said yes.

Kenny admitted to helping OSA Int handle me.

All I'd like to hear, is that DM apologized to RM, MY and MR and others, and that the stuff has been ordered stopped.

I'll broadcast that good news as soon as I hear it!

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)
Flag Dec 1975-Jun 1983 (TTC, Sup, Word Clearer, D of T, etc.)
Int Base 1983-1984 (Routing Forms Pjt)
Snr HCO Int in the FB in LA 1984-87
Re-Training (Int and LA) 87-88
Int Training Org, LA 88 (Sec Checker Sup)
LRH Tech Research and Comps, CMO Int, (Sept 88-Feb 89)
Int RPF (Feb-Mar 89)
PAC RPF (Mar-May 89)
Int Training Org (May-Sept 89) (Admin Sup)
INCOMM Sep 89-Sept 90 (Routing Forms Pjt)
INCOMM Sept 90-May92 (Computer Room LA & Int)
ASI May 92-Dec95 (Computer Room, In-Training Esto)
Decks Int (Dec 95-Jun 96)
Int RPF (Jun 96-Nov 2000)

PAC RPF (Nov 2000-Mar2003)
Routed out March 29, 2003.
Join XSO and network to old Sea Org friends:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSO/
Chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
http://www.freewebs.com/chuckbeatty77/
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05205/542899.stm
412-260-1170 (I'll be happy to network anyone to anyone)
(media call me from time to time, and I will
network anyone to media so people with firsthand
experiences can anonymously or publicly help
expose things that obviously should be changed
inside the movement.)



Ex Int staffers!! Please go public, expose the petty physical abuse at Int!
From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Date: Wed, Mar 15 2006 7:55 pm
Email: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

Speaking out publicly, to media, is the most effective way to expose what is obviously wrong with the Scientology movement.

Ex top ranking members who've worked at Int who've seen the alleged petty physical abuse by David Miscavige of other Int staffers, particularly anyone who's seen David Miscavige smack and punch Mike Rinder to the ground, which 2 persons so far have seen, but when other ex Int staffers come out and confirm this petty physical abuse by David Miscavige, THEN some real pressure will occur and possibly cause this petty abuse to stop finally!

I urge those who've seen it, to expose it.

People willing to go public with their names, is what media need.

That is a tough dividing line, but those who have the courage, it will be worth it to get the worst exposed.

Please go public!

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)
Join XSO and network to old Sea Org friends:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSO/
http://www.freewebs.com/chuckbeatty77/
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05205/542899.stm
412-260-1170 (I'll be happy to network anyone to anyone)
(media call me from time to time, and I will
network anyone to media so people with firsthand
experiences can anonymously or publicly help
expose things that obviously should be changed
inside the movement.)



Date: Fri, Mar 17 2006 9:19 am
Email: "chuckbeatty77 @aol.com"
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

bb wrote:
> chuckbeatty77 @aol.com wrote:

bb wrote: One wonders with all these testimonies why he was not fitness boarded out of the SO. Instead he spent a very long time trying to route out.

bb

from bb again,

Hi Chuck,

Sometimes written communication over the net dosn't quite come out right. I was being too subtle. My comments were ironic.

Were all those accusations true, its my understanding that you WOULD have been fitness boarded out. Or declared. I was attempting to dead agent the accusations.

There is the interesting phrase, " The overt doth speak loudly in accusation." I'd say one may look at that concept reversely. All I've ever seen you say about the individuals you worked with is that they were good guys, you respected them. To me that shows a good heart.

bb

from chuck to bb,

Dear bb,

The accusations are just the 2nd tack, first tack was "Chuck the pervert" now the tack is "Chuck the violence prone individual", and I could detail to what degree I said what, in what context, but it would take a couple hours. Am I a pervert, short answer no. Am I violent, that's ridiculous.

What I said in session, what I said in discussions, that were written up by my then RPF twin Clark Morton, that I know at least Bruce Hines will counter the heavily slanted reports that my Int RPF twin Clark Morton wrote up on me. I've given Bruce Hines who was my Int RPF Case Supervisor, full freedom of speech if anyone truly cares to ask him about my auditing details and what I said. Also Jean Disher was my C/S, and also Jacqueline Kevenar, while I was on the Int RPF. Any of them want to call me, and discuss my case with me or anyone else, feel free.

That'd be a laugh to hear people who thought they understood me, to discuss me. That's one of the reasons I had to get out, as well. The lack of duplication I felt, just not ever gonna happen, while one is in the confines of the RPF and the pressure predicaments of the RPF.

At some point, I want to get informed of various confinement issues, since I think the whole RPF experience is probably an overal degrading and detrimental experience, not unless those running it really have their heads on right. It can degrade so easily, and the only people who are not adversely affected, get through by not being chaffed to the point of degradation by the constricting rules of the RPF.

At the time I had my "violent" thoughts, the consctrictions, my wallet and money and credit cards were taken away from me, like they were taken from all RPFers, and the RPF was being turned into a minimum security prison camp all during that time period, and I was known on the RPF to be one of the "worst" cases. My twin Clark Morton, I knew had "taken me on" as part of his own obligated "amends" and him "handling me" would win him merit, so I believe you as a trained auditor, know that in such settings, it was completely unlikely I would get any "case gain" (and I agree with Susan's views today, and what I said above). Clark didn't get [understand] me, and we both knew that. We were mistwinned, and that was Chris Guider's fault. I being who I am, I submissively willingly tried to paper over the faulty mistwinship, but the bottom line I was incorrectly coerced into continuing on the Int RPF, and should have let route out in August 1997 when I refused to continue waiting to route out, which by August 1997, I'd been being audited 1 hour a day on the route out program by Rich Gilbert, a Class IX on the Int RPF).

I tried not to veer into the details of the "violent" thoughts, but you see where it would go. Right into the frustrating predicaments of the Int RPF rules, and coercive crap that went on even there.

If I threatened anyone incorrectly with violence, I am sorry. Come forward, I will freely admit what I did wrong.

Did I ever act with violence, never.

And, for the record, I have said this before, the auditors I had auditing me, a lot of them, even the vaunted RTC auditor Gerda Herrerra, in Dec 1995 and Jan 1996, misduplicated words coming out of my mouth. If you are recently church trained, you know during and after Sec Checks the auditor is obligated to write the "Session Knowledge Reports" on the bad things the person said in session. Those "Session Knowledge Reports" end up in a person's Ethics Folder. Well it was repeatedly my experience that the "Session Knowledge Reports" were chock full of misduplications by the auditors.

Also, if you are a trained auditor, you know how bad the session reports themselves are. The auditor in Scientology is trained NOT to be stenographic, but just get certain key things in the reports.

So the info the church Office of Special Affairs Folder Error Summary people extracted is faulty, due to the auditor's faulty duplication of what I said.

So there is compounding of errors, misduplication initially, overly harshly slanted Knowledge Reports based on what I said in session, using the auditor's words, not mine, and this whole "Chuck is a violent individual" is not based on one iota of behavior, I just don't have that kind of history, and the thousands of people who knew me, know this also.

It's orchestrated wittingly and unwittingly distorted calumny issued by fake people, at OSA's orchestrated self-serving behest, based on the worst of LRH's writings (they don't go doing this stuff not unless Hubbard said so, just like the Colonel in the "A Few Good Men", the church staff follow orders, and no one in the church would be doing this stuff, not unless it was pretty clear from Hubbard's writings that they are obligated to do this), and when a few of these people call me, to engage in normal discourse, then the church will have advanced to the same playing field as the rest of the world freely exists in.

Right now, I make this all freely known for history's sake in the public domain, so that wiser minds can sort through the details and compare how Scientology marginalizes and seeks to discredit and degrade their former members who speak out.

Sad, but they are still doing it. It's their "head on a pike" and all the rest of their sad tactics that only recoil to their own discredit, which they don't see, due to LRH not seeing, so they are stuck in this pattern, their own Catch 22 predicament.

So in the end, I don't hold this against anyone personally, no one is getting hurt by this smearing, I know the people who know me and know what type of person I am, and I know the people who C/Sed and audited me who are OUT of the movement, know this is all cheap self-serving calumny, so I am not bothered by it.

Again, I think of the Milgram experiment, and am sad that people are being directed into fits of hatred for me, those inside the movement, who don't know me, the newer people who don't know me, who hear these smears. But even when I was in, and when I read the outrageous smearing SP declares and crap that the church spread on Dennis Erlich and Gerry Armstrong and Stacy and Vaughn Young, I still knew each of those 4 as good people, I didn't let the church smearing material that was spread even internally change my views about the ex-Sea Org members that were being smeared, even when I was part of the Sea Org.

So, my friends are those that see through it all. And I greatly appreciate the ARS and Clambake forums for finding so many people who see through all this crap as a given!

There are plenty of people in the movement who if they were to see this bullshit on me, they'd know it was bullshit and they'd know it was just stuff that OSA is obligated to pull. They just can't voice their feelings, like I wasn't to tell anyone I thought well of Gerry, Dennis, etc., when I was in. I just sort of stood around, Milgram experiment-like:

http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/milgram_perils_authority_19...

Thanks. People may or may not move through the learning curves to see their ways out of this mess. That's their business. I hope they do though.

Chuck Beatty



Any recent ex Int staffers, or ex OSA Int staffers please update me!
Date: Sun, Mar 26 2006 1:14 pm
Email: "chuckbeatty77 @aol.com"
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

Anyone who's left Int in this year, 2006, or anyone who's defected out of OSA (office of Special Affairs), please contact me.

1) Have the petty rantings/scoldings/humilations and petty abuse (slappings, punchings, etc.) stopped uplines? For real?

2) Is OSA Int getting full pay in recent months?

3) Are the Int orgs' staffs getting full pay? Particularly Gold staff, getting full pay?

4) Are staff getting liberties in OSA or at Int?

5) What's the atmosphere compared to earlier years?

You can anonymously call, have a friend call so I don't recognize your voice, this toll free number: (toll free means it is free to call within the US!):

dial *67 866-XSEAORG (this all comes out as: *67-866-973-2674) by dialing *67 first, that ensures the phone number you are dialing from does NOT show up on my phone records, in case you are concerned someone snooping my records could track back to you.

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)
Flag Dec 1975-Jun 1983 (TTC, Sup, Word Clearer, D of T, etc.)
Int Base 1983-1984 (Routing Forms Pjt)
Snr HCO Int in the FB in LA 1984-87
Re-Training (Int and LA) 87-88
Int Training Org, LA 88 (Sec Checker Sup)
LRH Tech Research and Comps, CMO Int, (Sept 88-Feb 89)
Int RPF (Feb-Mar 89)
PAC RPF (Mar-May 89)
Int Training Org (May-Sept 89) (Admin Sup)
INCOMM Sep 89-Sept 90 (Routing Forms Pjt)
INCOMM Sept 90-May92 (Computer Room LA & Int)
ASI May 92-Dec95 (Computer Room, In-Training Esto)
Decks Int (Dec 95-Jun 96)
Int RPF (Jun 96-Nov 2000)
PAC RPF (Nov 2000-Mar2003)
Routed out March 29, 2003.
Join XSO and network to old Sea Org friends:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSO/
Chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
http://www.freewebs.com/chuckbeatty77/
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05205/542899.stm
412-260-1170 (I'll be happy to network anyone to anyone)
(media call me from time to time, and I will
network anyone to media so people with firsthand
experiences can anonymously or publicly help
expose things that obviously should be changed
inside the movement.)



3 new voices come my way, Chuck Beatty

Date: Mon, Mar 27 2006 12:05 pm
Email: "chuckbeatty77 @aol.com"
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

For the History books, here are 3 recent communications I've received:

(1)

In a message dated 3/26/2006 11:16:39 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,

[email protected] writes:

Chuck,

I became aware that either you wrote or you broadcasted a information about me while I was on the RPF and I just wanted to let you know a few things, first of all I am a Scientologist I was born and raised as one and I am proud of it.

In the comm I saw you mention that we were kicked out because we didn't make it let me clear this up we went out ethics and we screwed up our chances to stay in.

The real point though is that i don't think that you or anybody else should be getting into my life and then twisting it how you see fit, I really don't want people who i know and admire to be telling me that I am in these anti Scientologist web pages.

What right do you have to talk about me and my private life? I don't find it acceptable at all.

I understand that you have a beef but deal with it, don't splatter your life and then everybody else just because you are upset.

I mean Scientology no matter how you think about it is an idea about how to better mankind, so is every other religion. It has a strict code of conduct, but honestly most religions do.

So you screwed up, so did I. It doesn't mean we can't pick ourselves up and keep going. it would be nice if we could go back and redo it but we can't. In the mean time how about we have the pride and the dignity to not mudsling.

I am not interested in carrying on this conversation nor do I want to find out this is posted in all your anti Scientologist sites I want you to read this and understand it, please do what you can to wipe out the earlier mentions of myself and also M.W.S. [lady who was my last PAC RPF twin]. I know she cared for you very much when you were twinned up with her and she did her best to help you, so for that sake help her out too.

F A

[My comments: This person was on the PAC RPF during the time I was there. He became twinned to the lady who was my last RPF twin. When I first started posting freely on the internet in 2004, this above person phoned me twice in 2004-5 to try to feel me out, pump me for info for OSA, and similarly tried to ensure I was not communicating nor swaying the lady (M.W.S.) towards the "dark" side, my opinion. He admitted working for OSA back then when I confronted him on the phone. He's again on board, sending me a message in his own style, which I think is good that they let me speak the way he can. But it's my opinion he was obviously been communicated to recently by persons who have encouraged him to communicate to me. He didn't surf the net and decide to communicate to me all on his own, he's been informally led into this communication above, and were we to learn who his contacts and encourgers were, they'd trace back to the Office of Special Affairs program for "handling me." Sad.]

(2)

March 23, 2006
Chuck,
I just found out that you have been discussing my experiencs as a Scientologist on an internet bulletin board. My religious beliefs and how I practice them are frankly none of your business and I regard your posting them on a bulletin board as an invasion of my privacy. I request you cease doing this as it is offensive as well as something you know nothing about.
MM

[My comments: This is someone who was on the PAC RPF, has held positions high into the top ranks, and a former OSA Int staffer, former WDC member, former Exec Strata member, and a very smart individual in the movement, someone I respected and still do. How he "found out" of my postings, I can only imagine it was through the urgings of Office of Special Affairs connected people who informed him of my mentioning of him in my internet posts and then he was informally encouraged into communicating the above rough message to me. His duplication of the OSA intended message to transmit to me, is very high. He's a sharp man, like the following lady, who similarly is very smart, and who's ability to relay the OSA intended message to me, is at a high level.]

(3) [two emails from the same person next]

March 21, 2006
Chuck,
I don't appreciate that you feel you have some sort of authority to post publicly something that I wrote to someone on a personal basis. My privacy is my privacy and not public knowledge. This is to put you on notice that I will not tolerate further violation of my privacy.
M.C.H.

March 23, 2006
I wish there were people telling me what to do, but you're wrong and you just don't get it. You don't realize that you are hurting me and others violating our privacy. I just wwant you to know that I am putting you on notice that I absolutely will not tolerate any further violation of my privacy.
M.C.

[My comments: This person is talking about a smear email composed by Office of Special Affairs, sent around in her name to a half dozen ex Sea Org members on the XSO chat group. I didn't post that email, I only publicly commented my opinion that that email was clearly Office of Special Affairs Church of Scientology International composed. The intent of that smear email sent in this person's [M.C.H.'s] name, absolutely was NOT the composition solely of M.C.H. All of the ex Sea Org members who received that smear email in MCH's name, took it as a blatant smear tactic with OSA footprints left right and center, all unfortunately based on L. Ron Hubbard's worst ideas that faithful adherents, like all these 3 people above, are locked into cooperating with the implementation of LRH's counter smearing and silencing tactics. I am glad that OSA has even bothered, really, at this. It shows at least some faithful adherents are allowed to communicate somewhat to someone who is declared Suppressive. OSA could have escalated the harrassment of me, etc. Instead, the above OSA controlled tactic shows a lightening, briefly, compared to the 3 Kenny Shapiro smear emails that OSA more darkly contributed directly to, about me.]

[I note these 3 people's communications to me for the history books. The caution to respect people's privacy message, is the same message that Elliot Abelson transmitted to me in his second phone to me, in late 2004. It is clearly Office of Special Affairs orchestrating, however informally, these 3 people above to originate these communications to me, transmitting the same privacy concerns.]

Chuck Beatty
Ex-Sea Org (lifetime staffer, 1975-2003)



From: chuckbeatty77 @aol.com - view profile
Date: Fri, Mar 31 2006 1:17 am
Email: "chuckbeatty77 @aol.com"
Groups: alt.religion.scientology

Suzy Creamcheese wrote:
Thanks.I like Suzy too. Apparently someone above won't answer me due to my frivolous nickname, haha. I don't even know what's a joke and what's paranoia anymore after reading this board. Am I me or am I not me? (Suzy pinches herself and feels it.) Anyway, I have another question if you don't mind. I guess not many Scientologists come to this board, but I am wondering if those who do are not even supposed to read the postings of critics or people who've been declared suppressive? Thanks for the site, I'll go there. I gotta go , I'm getting hooked on forums.
[Suzy Creamchees]

Dear Suzy,

Here are some punishable Suppressive Acts, why Scientologists in good standing cannot come to ARS regularly and enjoy reading and posting here without penalty.

"Continued adherence to a person or group pronounced a suppressive person or group by HCO." - Hubbard, Introduction to Scientology Ethics. [ARS is a suppressive chat site.]

"Failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of suppressive acts." - Hubbard, Introduction to Scientology Ethics. [This prevents Scientologists from casually reading or posting here.]

Only certain official Scientologists are deemed proof of the suppressive writings here on ARS, and those special Scientologists do it namely for their jobs.

Regular practising Scientologists would suffer penalties from the church for illicitly participating on this site!

Chuck Beatty
412-260-1170 (Pittsburgh, call me anytime)
27 year ex lifetime staffer in the Scientology movement (1975-2003)



DISCLAIMER: This site is not connected to or endorsed by the Church of Scientology™. Dianetics™, Scientology are service marks and trademarks reportedly owned by Religious Technology Center, and permission was not sought for their fair use here.




Home

















This site is hosted for FREE by FreeWebs.com. Click here to get your own Free Website!